Rigorous Evaluation versus Trust-Based Learning
This article delves into the ongoing debate within the philanthropic sector regarding the perceived tension between rigorous evaluation and trust-based learning approaches.
By examining whether this dichotomy is valid, the piece offers insights into how organizations navigate the complexities of measuring impact while fostering trust-based relationships with grantees.
Through case studies and expert perspectives, readers gain a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with each approach.
Ultimately, the article seeks to provoke critical thinking and dialogue among philanthropic professionals, encouraging them to consider how best to balance accountability and trust in their grantmaking practices.